You are currently viewing 8051 vs. PIC: The Microcontroller Battle of the Century

8051 vs. PIC: The Microcontroller Battle of the Century

Introduction

In the world of embedded systems and microcontrollers, two titans have long stood at the forefront: the venerable 8051 and the versatile PIC (Peripheral Interface Controller). These microcontroller families have shaped the landscape of embedded design for decades, each bringing its unique strengths to the table. In this comprehensive analysis, we’ll dive deep into the intricacies of both architectures, exploring their histories, capabilities, and real-world applications to determine which might reign supreme in various scenarios.

A Brief History: Origins and Evolution

The 8051 Legacy

The 8051 microcontroller, first introduced by Intel in 1980, has become one of the most popular microcontrollers of all time. Its 8-bit architecture and robust design have stood the test of time, with numerous manufacturers continuing to produce variants with enhanced features.

Key milestones in 8051 evolution:

  • 1980: Original 8051 introduced by Intel
  • 1990s: Third-party manufacturers begin producing enhanced 8051 variants
  • 2000s: Introduction of high-speed 8051 cores and advanced peripherals

The Rise of PIC

Microchip Technology’s PIC microcontrollers entered the scene in the mid-1970s, originally designed as a peripheral controller for the CP1600 CPU. The PIC architecture has since evolved into a diverse family of microcontrollers, ranging from 8-bit to 32-bit designs.

PIC evolution highlights:

  • 1975: First PIC device developed
  • 1985: General availability of PIC devices
  • Late 1990s: Introduction of PIC16 and PIC18 series
  • 2000s: Launch of 16-bit and 32-bit PIC microcontrollers

Architecture Comparison: 8051 vs. PIC

Memory Architecture

8051 Memory Structure:

  • Harvard architecture
  • Separate program and data memory
  • 64KB program memory
  • 256 bytes of internal RAM

PIC Memory Structure:

  • Modified Harvard architecture
  • Separate program and data memory
  • Program memory size varies by model (up to several MB in high-end devices)
  • Data memory size varies (from a few bytes to several KB)

Instruction Set

8051 Instruction Set:

  • CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing)
  • 255 instructions
  • Variable instruction length (1 to 3 bytes)

PIC Instruction Set:

  • RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing)
  • Fewer instructions (35 for PIC16, 75 for PIC18)
  • Fixed instruction length (typically 14 bits for PIC16, 16 bits for PIC18)

Clock Speed and Performance

The 8051 and PIC families offer a wide range of clock speeds, depending on the specific model and manufacturer. However, we can make some general comparisons:

8051 Performance:

  • Traditional 8051 cores: 1-33 MHz
  • Enhanced 8051 cores: Up to 100 MHz or more

PIC Performance:

  • Low-end PICs: 4-20 MHz
  • High-performance PICs: Up to 200 MHz or more

It’s important to note that clock speed alone doesn’t tell the whole story. The RISC architecture of PICs often allows them to execute instructions more efficiently, potentially offering better performance at lower clock speeds.

Programming and Development Environment

8051 Programming

8051 microcontrollers are typically programmed in C or Assembly. The robust ecosystem around the 8051 has led to the development of numerous IDEs and toolchains.

Sample 8051 C code for blinking an LED:

#include <reg51.h>
#include <stdio.h>

void delay(unsigned int count)
{
    unsigned int i;
    for(i=0;i<count;i++);
}

void main()
{
    while(1)
    {
        P1 = 0x55;  // Turn on LED connected to P1.0
        delay(1000);
        P1 = 0x00;  // Turn off LED
        delay(1000);
    }
}

PIC Programming

PIC microcontrollers support programming in C, Assembly, and often higher-level languages like BASIC. Microchip’s MPLAB X IDE is a popular choice for PIC development.

Sample PIC C code for blinking an LED:

#include <xc.h>

#define _XTAL_FREQ 4000000  // 4 MHz clock frequency

void main(void) {
    TRISB = 0;  // Set PORTB as output

    while(1) {
        PORTB = 0xFF;  // Turn on LED connected to RB0
        __delay_ms(1000);
        PORTB = 0x00;  // Turn off LED
        __delay_ms(1000);
    }
}

Peripheral Integration and Expansion

8051 Peripherals

The 8051 architecture includes a standard set of peripherals, with enhanced variants offering additional features:

Many modern 8051 variants also include:

  • ADC
  • PWM
  • I2C and SPI interfaces

PIC Peripherals

PIC microcontrollers are known for their extensive peripheral integration, often including:

  • Multiple Timer/Counter modules
  • UART, I2C, and SPI interfaces
  • ADC and DAC
  • PWM modules
  • USB and CAN interfaces (in higher-end models)
  • DMA controllers

The wide range of integrated peripherals in PIC microcontrollers often allows for reduced component count in final designs.

Power Consumption and Efficiency

Both 8051 and PIC families offer low-power modes, but the implementation and efficiency can vary significantly between specific models.

8051 Power Management

Many modern 8051 variants include multiple power-saving modes:

  • Idle mode
  • Power-down mode
  • Power-saving peripheral management

Example: Entering power-down mode on an 8051:

MOV PCON, #02H  ; Set PD bit in PCON register

PIC Power Management

PIC microcontrollers often feature advanced power management capabilities:

  • Sleep mode
  • Deep sleep mode
  • Peripheral module disable
  • Dynamic voltage scaling (in some models)

Example: Entering sleep mode on a PIC:

SLEEP();  // Enter sleep mode
NOP();    // Recommended NOP after SLEEP instruction

Real-World Applications: 8051 vs. PIC

To truly understand the strengths of each architecture, let’s explore some real-world applications where each excels.

8051 in Action

  1. Industrial Control Systems
  • Robust architecture suitable for harsh environments
  • Wide operating temperature range
  • Example: Factory automation equipment
  1. Consumer Electronics
  • Cost-effective for high-volume production
  • Established codebase and development tools
  • Example: Washing machine controllers
  1. Automotive Applications
  • Reliable performance in demanding conditions
  • Strong EMI resistance
  • Example: Engine management systems

PIC Shining Bright

  1. IoT Devices
  • Low power consumption for battery-operated devices
  • Integrated wireless interfaces in some models
  • Example: Smart home sensors
  1. Portable Medical Devices
  • Advanced analog peripherals for signal processing
  • Low power modes for extended battery life
  • Example: Blood glucose meters
  1. Educational and Hobbyist Projects
  • Easy-to-use development tools
  • Wide range of low-cost development boards
  • Example: DIY robotics projects

Performance Benchmarks: 8051 vs. PIC

To provide a quantitative comparison, let’s examine some performance benchmarks for typical embedded tasks:

  1. GPIO Toggle Rate
  • 8051 (50 MHz): ~5 MHz
  • PIC16 (20 MHz): ~3 MHz
  • PIC18 (40 MHz): ~7 MHz
  1. ADC Sampling Rate
  • 8051 with integrated ADC: Up to 500 ksps
  • PIC16 with 10-bit ADC: Up to 100 ksps
  • PIC18 with 12-bit ADC: Up to 200 ksps
  1. Interrupt Latency
  • 8051: 3-7 clock cycles
  • PIC16: 3-5 clock cycles
  • PIC18: 3-4 clock cycles

These benchmarks provide a general idea, but it’s crucial to note that performance can vary significantly between specific models and implementations.

Choosing Between 8051 and PIC: Decision Factors

When deciding between 8051 and PIC microcontrollers for a project, consider the following factors:

  1. Project Requirements
  • Processing power needed
  • Peripheral requirements
  • Power consumption constraints
  1. Development Experience
  • Familiarity with architecture and toolchain
  • Availability of code libraries and examples
  1. Cost Considerations
  • Unit cost for production
  • Development tool costs
  1. Long-term Support
  • Manufacturer’s commitment to the architecture
  • Availability of long-life components
  1. Ecosystem and Community
  • Third-party tools and resources
  • Community support and forums

The Future of 8051 and PIC

As embedded systems continue to evolve, both the 8051 and PIC architectures are adapting to meet new challenges:

8051 Future Developments

  • Integration of advanced wireless interfaces
  • Further improvements in power efficiency
  • Enhanced security features for IoT applications

PIC Future Outlook

  • Expansion of 32-bit PIC32 family
  • Integration of AI and machine learning capabilities
  • Advanced power management for ultra-low-power IoT devices

Conclusion: Choosing Your Champion

In the battle of 8051 vs. PIC, there’s no clear-cut winner. Each architecture brings its strengths to the table:

8051 Strengths:

  • Time-tested reliability
  • Extensive knowledge base and legacy code
  • Strong performance in industrial and automotive applications

PIC Strengths:

  • Wide range of options from 8-bit to 32-bit
  • Excellent peripheral integration
  • Strong in low-power and analog-intensive applications

Ultimately, the choice between 8051 and PIC comes down to the specific requirements of your project, your development experience, and the ecosystem you’re most comfortable with. Both architectures continue to evolve and find their place in the ever-changing landscape of embedded systems.

Whether you choose the battle-tested 8051 or the versatile PIC, you’ll be equipped with a powerful tool to bring your embedded designs to life. The true winner in this microcontroller battle is the embedded systems community, which benefits from the ongoing innovation and competition between these two remarkable architectures.

Mohan Vadnere

Mohan is an embedded system engineer by profession. He started his career designing and writing code for consumer electronics, industrial automation and automotive systems. Mohan is working in automotive electronics since last 19 years. He loves working at the hardware software interfaces.Mohan has Master of Science in Instrumentation from University of Pune and Masters of Technology in embedded systems from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India.

Leave a Reply